Weathering the Broken Links

Wow! I got a call from none other than Jerry Garcia. No, not from beyond the grave. Rather this Jerry Garcia, the CIO of Cardtronics.  I never told anyone at Cardtronics about my blog post.  I merely had described the problem to someone in a voice mail and asked for a callback.  Jerry found the blog post, associated it with my earlier phone call, and took the time to explain to me what happened.

It turns out that I was wrong when I surmised that there were no hotkeys/accelerators.

The screen does not indicate any sort of accelerator or hotkeys for automatically selecting one of the common withdrawal amounts

But I was right that they weren’t displayed on the screen.  According to Jerry, the ATM is equiped with some sort of radio transmitter that visually impaired people can tun into with a radio to get verbal directions.  If you were to be listening to what the ATM is saying when you get to the screen asking for the amount, you’d hear it saying to press the 5 key to withdraw $20.  And the keypad has tactile landmarks that allow a visually impaired person to locate the proper keys.

Further, Jerry indiciated that they’ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out the best ways to accomodate those with disabilities and given the hardware available on the particular ATM model, this was deemed to be the best design.  As I was a little caught off guard with the call and the information on accessibility, I wasn’t able to offer any suggestions for alternatives.  It seems most of the obvious ones add burdens for the visually impaired.

But as I type this up, I wonder if it might be good for Cardtronics to try and add two things to the displayed screen:

1. a message explaining that there are Numbered hotkeys for each of the dollar amounts
2. the number for each amount displayed in a small font or icon next to each dollar amount

In effect, it wouldn’t prevent someone from fat fingering the ATM and selecting the wrong amount.  But it would, give those of us blessed with good vision an indication that the numeric keypad below the screen is expecting input that may affect our transaction.  I don’t know if this is possible with that model of ATM and I’m aware of some of the perils of cluttering the screen with extra information that may not be obvious to your average user.  However, I think it would reduce the liklihood that others get bit by my mistake, and it might even raise awareness that there are disable people with special needs.

Mr. Garcia: thank you for your top notch response to a customer gripe.  Now that I understand what happened, I can accept the design issue…nothing can be perfect and compromises often win out.  I hope that it can be improved at some point and I’ll continue to use your machine; it is so convenient.

I got bit by a usability issue at a Cardtronics ATM a few days ago. I usually use a particular ATM near my house because, despite requiring a $2 fee, it allows me to take out more than other ATMs a little farther away. To minimize the fees, I always take out the maximum allowed, $400. I’ve got the keystrokes down pat, well nearly pat. I fat-fingered a key at this screen.

The ATM is prompting me to select a denomination by pressing a push button on either side of the screen.   In the past, I’ve discovered that I don’t really have to press the button associated with “Other.” Instead, on the keypad below, I can just enter 4 0 0 and it’ll accept it as $400.00. Well, instead of pressing the 4 on the keypad to start entering 400, I bumped the 5 key. Surprise, surprise. Instead of starting to enter a dollar value starting with a 5, it interpreted this as identical to pressing the quick-withdraw button next to the $20 selection on the screen.

Realizing that I was going to be charged $2 for a non-$400 transaction, I tried pressing Cancel and Clear in vain. I spit out a single $20 and my transaction receipt.   I was a little mad.   And I ended up going through another transaction to get my $400, and paying another transaction fee.

So what happened?  The screen does not indicate any sort of accelerator or hotkeys for automatically selecting one of the common withdrawal amounts.  That’s what the physical buttons to the sides of the screen are for.   Also note that the machine only dispenses in multiples $of 20 and only dispenses up to $400.  In other words, you are not allowed to take out $5, $50, or $500.  The machine seems to interpret even numbers as implicitly meaning an “Other” amount and doesn’t require you to press that lower-right button.  But if you enter an odd number, it treats it as an invalid input…and instead of telling you so, it instead treats it as a request to take out the smallest amount possible.

Well this seems like a bit of a scam.  After all, I can explicitly press “Other” and, on the next screen, enter 5 0.  It tells me that this is not an allowed amount.  But on this screen instead of telling me the same thing, it decides to make me pay the highest fee-to-dispensed-amount ratio; that’s 10% fee for the mathematically challenged! 

In the end, I followed Cardtronics instructions for getting my fee back and my financial institution took care of the claim.  I also called Cardtronics and explained what happened.  The service representative seemed to understand the issue.  But I had to press her to forward the usability issue on to someone else.  In the end she said she’d tell the staff that does the software updates for the machine, but it didn’t sound like much was going to get done about it.

So I called back, got a hold of an operator, and explained the issue to her.  She put me through to the voicemail of some one who supposedly can do something with my feedback.  I’ll provide an update about where this goes, if anywhere.

UPDATE: See here for what transpired.

I’m hard on watches. Invariably, I end up scratching or cracking the face or breaking the strap or attachment pins on them just months acquiring new ones. I either have a poor sense of my dimensions or just like walking too close to walls and catching my appendages on all sorts of things.

In fact, I just about gave up on wearing a watch many years ago when I started carrying a cell phone all the time; the phone does double duty as a watch. Yes, I’m hard on cell phones and cell phone holsters too, but apparently I’m not as careless about banging my hips into things as I am my wrists.

Recently, the display on my phone fritzed out and I still had a couple months on my cell phone contract. It wasn’t something simple to fix, replacing the ribbon cable had no effect. Rather buy a new phone I continued using my phone as just a phone as I really didn’t need to see the screen to place and answer calls. But, of course, it no longer functioned as my watch.

So I decide to try to reinstate watch wearing. After all, a phone is awkward as a watch. Even after using my phone as a watch for some 8 years, it still bothered me to waste the time in the motion of removing my phone, pressing a button, checking the time, and replacing my phone. This technique is even more awkward when wearing a coat, driving, or carrying stuff.

So I spent a little bit on a new watch. Not wanting to spend too much and thinking it’d be nice to have one with an alarm and a timer, I picked out not-too-cheesy looking digital sports watch in a black and silver finish.  I figured an “IRONMAN Triathlon” might stand up to some abuse.

I was wrong.  After a mere month an a half, the plastic (ah there was my mistake) body that surrounds the watch cracked right where the metal wrist band connects.  I must have torqued the watch against something, the strap tore out, and ripped the pin that holds it out, bending the pin and deforming the pin holes in the watch body.

I straightened the pin and managed to get it all put back together.  But since it has a gap and the pin attachment holes are now too big, it simply won’t stay together for very long.  Inevitably, I bump it on something, the strap pulls out, and the watch falls to the floor.  I tried filling in the gap in the plastic body with a couple different kinds of epoxy and have found that the plastic that this watch body is made of is just plain inert.  None of the glues stay in place.

Don’t get me wrong.  I don’t fault Timex for a flimsy watch.  I abuse watches and it wasn’t all that expensive.  I guess I’ve just reached that time in my life where I need to invest in a real watch.

Rarely do you see a story about someone who is not in law enforcement who uses a gun for self defense told in a way that doesn’t spin against gun ownership and use.   This one is a refreshing change.

… “When she pulled over to check her tires one of those person in that other car got out and attempted to rob her at knife point.”

But what the thief didn’t expect happened next. Coppinger says the female driver pulled out her handgun.

“She pointed that at her attacker and he backed away, got in the car and they fled.” …

Quite simply she used a gun judiciously to deter a crime against her. She didn’t lose her mind and go on a rampage killing people because she was carrying a gun.

I congratulate Jared Broyles and KFSM-TV for running this story.

I recorded a show called “Guns in America” on the National Geographic channel last night. I was really hoping to see some sort of positive representation of guns, gun ownership, and gun use. What I saw when I watched this morning was a bad attempt at pretending to perhaps provide a fair story in the topic. They certainly did showed positive aspects of gun ownership, but always managed to inject some disparaging comment from the anti-gun camp.

I could go on and on about all the idiotic things they said pretending to be neutral. But this commentary really got me ROFLing…and then crying:

“This is a family of law abiding gun enthusiasts. Still, if this cache of weapons ever were stolen, chances are they would make it into criminal hands.”

I suppose they meant they’d be sold to gangbangers and such. But I just can’t see how Peter Coyote (the narrator) could have uttered that line and then not complained to the writer, Patrick Prentice, that he’s going to sound like a moron.  After all, a gun stolen is a gun already in the hands of a criminal.

More importantly, this logic is one of many tells of the anti-gunners. They love to see laws that blame the gun owners when a criminal breaks into your home and steals your guns.**  They even want laws that allow prosecution of the original owner of the gun (i.e. the one that it was stolen from) if the gun is used in a crime.

These mindsets are clearly aimed and persecuting gun ownership.  Unless the owner of the gun that was stolen is criminally negligent, for example leaving their gun lying in the street, why are they to blame for being a victim of theft?  Do we try and charge typical burglary victims with conspiring to sell stolen goods when their DVD player or TV shows up on the black market?  No!  Why is a gun any different?